Competitor profile

M/S OM CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 58% of what they bid, and 66% of the value they chase.

64tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
64
64 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
37
26 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.0 Cr
of ₹13.6 Cr bid — 66.0% conversion
Win rate
57.8%
of 64 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count64 bids
57.8%
40.6%
Awarded3757.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected11.6%
Lost2640.6%
By value₹13.6 Cr
66.0%
33.1%
Awarded₹9.0 Cr66.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹12.7 L0.9%
Lost₹4.5 Cr33.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MUNICIPAL COUNCILS₹6.0 Cr66.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Goa₹9.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Supraj S Naik Tari11 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
SHUBHANGI PRAKASH BHANDARI0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Mr. Vishal Ulhas Dessai5 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹20.5 L
won head-to-head
04
Sayish D. Audi0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
BIPIN KRISHNA SHET MAPARI2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹17.3 L
won head-to-head
06
DARSHAN P NAIK GAONKAR0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedOM CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About M/S OM CONSTRUCTIONS

M/S OM CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 64 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 64 decided bids, it was awarded 37 — a 57.8% win rate — worth ₹9.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MUNICIPAL COUNCILS, at 66.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Goa. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Supraj S Naik Tari, SHUBHANGI PRAKASH BHANDARI and Mr. Vishal Ulhas Dessai. Supraj S Naik Tari bid on 27 of the same tenders and won 11 of them; M/S OM CONSTRUCTIONS won 14.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.