Competitor profile

Niwas Ananda Jadhav

They win 20% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
5
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.6 L
of ₹66.0 L bid — 17.6% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
20.0%
60.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected120.0%
Lost360.0%
By value₹66.0 L
17.6%
23.9%
58.5%
Awarded₹11.6 L17.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹15.8 L23.9%
Lost₹38.6 L58.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹11.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
YOGESH TATOBA CHAVAN0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SAI VINAYAK PAWAR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹17.7 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s Rameshwar Construction1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹14.7 L
won head-to-head
04
Ruturaj Sanjeev Salvi0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
TEJAS HARISHCHANDRA KAMBLI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNiwas Ananda awardedOthers

About Niwas Ananda Jadhav

Niwas Ananda Jadhav appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹11.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against YOGESH TATOBA CHAVAN, SAI VINAYAK PAWAR and M/s Rameshwar Construction. YOGESH TATOBA CHAVAN bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Niwas Ananda Jadhav won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.