Competitor profile

NISARGA HORTICULTURE AND GENERAL SERVICES

They win 14% of what they bid, but only 3% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

21tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
21
21 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.7 L
of ₹3.5 Cr bid — 3.1% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 21 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count21 bids
14.3%
81.0%
Awarded314.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected14.8%
Lost1781.0%
By value₹3.5 Cr
93.8%
Awarded₹10.7 L3.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.0 L3.2%
Lost₹3.2 Cr93.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
P.K.Enterprises7 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹99.2 L
won head-to-head
02
A.G.Horticulture Services3 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹86.8 L
won head-to-head
03
Varda Nursery0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹32.4 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s R S Sikarwar1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹32.4 L
won head-to-head
06
NTS Group0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNISARGA HORTICULTURE awardedOthers

About NISARGA HORTICULTURE AND GENERAL SERVICES

NISARGA HORTICULTURE AND GENERAL SERVICES appears as a bidder on 21 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 21 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹10.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Defence Research and Development Organisation, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against P.K.Enterprises, A.G.Horticulture Services and Varda Nursery. P.K.Enterprises bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; NISARGA HORTICULTURE AND GENERAL SERVICES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.