Competitor profile

NILANJAN GOSWAMI

They win 67% of what they bid, but only 52% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
20 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.0 L
of ₹9.7 L bid — 51.8% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded466.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost233.3%
By value₹9.7 L
51.8%
48.2%
Awarded₹5.0 L51.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.7 L48.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹4.9 L98.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹5.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
TARUN CHAUDHURI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SAMARESH MANA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.1 L
won head-to-head
03
Mahata Enterprise0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
TAPAS KUMAR ADHIKARY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Chandan Dasmahanta0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PRADIP BALA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNILANJAN GOSWAMI awardedOthers

About NILANJAN GOSWAMI

NILANJAN GOSWAMI appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹5.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 98.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against TARUN CHAUDHURI, SAMARESH MANA and Mahata Enterprise. TARUN CHAUDHURI bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; NILANJAN GOSWAMI won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.