Competitor profile

NIKHIL TAVANAPPA VADGAVE

They win 38% of what they bid — and 56% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
14 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹84.3 L
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 56.0% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
37.5%
62.5%
Awarded337.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost562.5%
By value₹1.5 Cr
56.0%
44.0%
Awarded₹84.3 L56.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹66.3 L44.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-SANGLI₹32.4 L38.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹84.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NITESH PRAVIN SHETTI0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
BHUSHAN MANIK VADGAVE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹11.7 L
won head-to-head
03
SALIM HUSEN SUBHEDAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SAMRUDDHI SHRIKANT JAGTAP0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
OMKAR NERLEKAR1 win · 1 shared tender
₹13.0 L
won head-to-head
06
PRATIK PRAKASH DEMANNA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNIKHIL TAVANAPPA awardedOthers

About NIKHIL TAVANAPPA VADGAVE

NIKHIL TAVANAPPA VADGAVE appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹84.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region-Pune, at 61.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NITESH PRAVIN SHETTI, BHUSHAN MANIK VADGAVE and SALIM HUSEN SUBHEDAR. NITESH PRAVIN SHETTI bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; NIKHIL TAVANAPPA VADGAVE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.