Competitor profile

M/S NEERAJ KUMAR SHUKLA

They win 67% of what they bid, and 59% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 59.3% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded666.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost333.3%
By value₹2.0 Cr
59.3%
40.7%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr59.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹82.2 L40.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S RAJIV SINGH1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹28.0 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Vinod Kumar Pandey0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S KAMDHENU CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MA DURGA ENTERPRISES1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹28.0 L
won head-to-head
05
Satya Prakash Singh1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹26.2 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s SANTOSH KUMAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNEERAJ KUMAR awardedOthers

About M/S NEERAJ KUMAR SHUKLA

M/S NEERAJ KUMAR SHUKLA appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Director Cum Chief Engineer RED, at 78.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S RAJIV SINGH, M/s Vinod Kumar Pandey and M/S KAMDHENU CONSTRUCTION. M/S RAJIV SINGH bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S NEERAJ KUMAR SHUKLA won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.