Competitor profile

Neeraj Bharat Vankundre

They win 30% of what they bid, and 26% of the value they chase.

48tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
31 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
47
48 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
26 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.2 Cr
of ₹8.7 Cr bid — 25.8% conversion
Win rate
29.8%
of 47 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count47 bids
29.8%
14.9%
55.3%
Awarded1429.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected714.9%
Lost2655.3%
By value₹8.7 Cr
25.8%
23.1%
51.1%
Awarded₹2.2 Cr25.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.0 Cr23.1%
Lost₹4.4 Cr51.1%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹2.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Shri Amol Vilas Chavan4 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹38.4 L
won head-to-head
02
R. V. Math1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹99.6 L
won head-to-head
03
sarathi engineers2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹11.7 L
won head-to-head
04
Pravin . R. Math3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹43.2 L
won head-to-head
05
Ninale Engineers2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹13.0 L
won head-to-head
06
TECHNO LAND ENGINNERS AND SURVEYORS1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹22.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNeeraj Bharat awardedOthers

About Neeraj Bharat Vankundre

Neeraj Bharat Vankundre appears as a bidder on 48 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 47 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 29.8% win rate — worth ₹2.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 49.4% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Shri Amol Vilas Chavan, R. V. Math and sarathi engineers. Shri Amol Vilas Chavan bid on 22 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Neeraj Bharat Vankundre won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.