Competitor profile

NAYAN SHIVAJI MADAV

They win 27% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
5 May 2026last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹74.4 L
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 36.7% conversion
Win rate
27.3%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
27.3%
72.7%
Awarded327.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost872.7%
By value₹2.0 Cr
36.7%
63.3%
Awarded₹74.4 L36.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.3 Cr63.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹74.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹74.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JITESH UMAJI NAIK2 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹40.7 L
won head-to-head
02
UTTAM MAHESH BIDYE2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹16.1 L
won head-to-head
03
Mr.LAKSHMIKANT RAMDAS NARVEKAR2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹27.5 L
won head-to-head
04
Navanath Waghu Pawar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MILIND SANTOSH MHAPSEKAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Shubham Sanjay Pawar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAYAN SHIVAJI awardedOthers

About NAYAN SHIVAJI MADAV

NAYAN SHIVAJI MADAV appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 27.3% win rate — worth ₹74.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against JITESH UMAJI NAIK, UTTAM MAHESH BIDYE and Mr.LAKSHMIKANT RAMDAS NARVEKAR. JITESH UMAJI NAIK bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; NAYAN SHIVAJI MADAV won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.