Competitor profile

NAWAZ AHMED SHAN

They win 43% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
23 May 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹57.7 L
of ₹7.1 Cr bid — 8.2% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
42.9%
28.6%
28.6%
Awarded342.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected228.6%
Lost228.6%
By value₹7.1 Cr
53.2%
38.6%
Awarded₹57.7 L8.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.8 Cr53.2%
Lost₹2.7 Cr38.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Abdul Qayoom Shan1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
shamas ud din2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹3.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Mohd Yousuf Shan0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
A. Q. Shan Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
NAWAZ AHMED HAJAM1 win · 1 shared tender
₹24.7 L
won head-to-head
06
SANGRAM SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAWAZ AHMED awardedOthers

About NAWAZ AHMED SHAN

NAWAZ AHMED SHAN appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹57.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Abdul Qayoom Shan, shamas ud din and Mohd Yousuf Shan. Abdul Qayoom Shan bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; NAWAZ AHMED SHAN won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.