Competitor profile

NAWAZ AHMED HAJAM

They win 50% of what they bid, and 58% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
15 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
4
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 58.2% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹2.0 Cr
58.2%
32.5%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr58.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹63.6 L32.5%
Lost₹18.1 L9.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NISAR AHMED SHAN0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
FAROOQ AHMAD BEIGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
FAROOQ AHMED KRIPAK0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Shamima Begum0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Nissar Ahmed0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BASHIR AHMED MALIK0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAWAZ AHMED awardedOthers

About NAWAZ AHMED HAJAM

NAWAZ AHMED HAJAM appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against NISAR AHMED SHAN, FAROOQ AHMAD BEIGH and FAROOQ AHMED KRIPAK. NISAR AHMED SHAN bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; NAWAZ AHMED HAJAM won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.