Competitor profile

NISAR AHMED SHAN

They win 23% of what they bid, but only 7% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

37tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
35
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
23 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹18.9 Cr bid — 7.5% conversion
Win rate
22.9%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count35 bids
22.9%
11.4%
65.7%
Awarded822.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected411.4%
Lost2365.7%
By value₹18.9 Cr
87.2%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr7.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹99.8 L5.3%
Lost₹16.5 Cr87.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

8 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SANJAY KUMAR1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹11.0 L
won head-to-head
02
FAROOQ AHMED4 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
ABDUL QAYOOM1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹14.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Kuldeep Kumar1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹14.7 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s Massaber Ali0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Nissar Ahmed2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹22.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNISAR AHMED awardedOthers

About NISAR AHMED SHAN

NISAR AHMED SHAN appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 22.9% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SANJAY KUMAR, FAROOQ AHMED and ABDUL QAYOOM. SANJAY KUMAR bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; NISAR AHMED SHAN won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.