Competitor profile

Navrang Decorators

They win 22% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
8 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹62.9 L
of ₹4.0 Cr bid — 15.6% conversion
Win rate
22.2%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
22.2%
22.2%
55.6%
Awarded222.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected222.2%
Lost555.6%
By value₹4.0 Cr
15.6%
28.7%
55.7%
Awarded₹62.9 L15.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.2 Cr28.7%
Lost₹2.2 Cr55.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RTU, Kota₹62.9 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹62.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ISLAM DECORATOR3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Neel Kamal Associates1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹23.7 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s M. K. Constructions0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Porwal Enterprsies0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHREE BALAJI INFRASTRACTURE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ISLAM DECORATORS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNavrang Decorators awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Navrang Decorators

About Navrang Decorators

Navrang Decorators appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 22.2% win rate — worth ₹62.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RTU, Kota, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ISLAM DECORATOR, Neel Kamal Associates and M/s M. K. Constructions. ISLAM DECORATOR bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Navrang Decorators won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.