Competitor profile

ISLAM DECORATOR

They win 42% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

31tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
21 Sept 2023last award
Total bids
31
31 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹8.7 Cr bid — 42.0% conversion
Win rate
41.9%
of 31 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count31 bids
41.9%
48.4%
Awarded1341.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected39.7%
Lost1548.4%
By value₹8.7 Cr
42.0%
49.9%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr42.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹70.1 L8.1%
Lost₹4.3 Cr49.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RTU, Kota₹3.6 Cr98.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹3.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Porwal Enterprsies5 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Neel Kamal Associates1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹23.7 L
won head-to-head
03
Shankar Pal Singh0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Navrang Decorators2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹62.9 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s M. K. Constructions1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹37.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M. B. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedISLAM DECORATOR awardedOthers

About ISLAM DECORATOR

ISLAM DECORATOR appears as a bidder on 31 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 31 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 41.9% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RTU, Kota, at 98.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Porwal Enterprsies, Neel Kamal Associates and Shankar Pal Singh. Porwal Enterprsies bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; ISLAM DECORATOR won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.