Competitor profile

M/s. Nav Yug Construction Co.

They win 33% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹23.8 L
of ₹64.7 L bid — 36.7% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded333.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost666.7%
By value₹64.7 L
36.7%
63.3%
Awarded₹23.8 L36.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹40.9 L63.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹23.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S BABA ANANDESHWAR CONSTRUCTION CO1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹10.2 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Parvez Trading Co.0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SRI RAM ENTERPRISES2 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹18.0 L
won head-to-head
04
NEXA ENTERPRISES1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹8.5 L
won head-to-head
05
KULDEEP ENTERPRISES2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹4.2 L
won head-to-head
06
S.K. ENTERPRISES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNav Yug Construction awardedOthers

About M/s. Nav Yug Construction Co.

M/s. Nav Yug Construction Co. appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹23.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Cheif Engineer Kanpur Zone PWD Kanpur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S BABA ANANDESHWAR CONSTRUCTION CO, M/s Parvez Trading Co. and SRI RAM ENTERPRISES. M/S BABA ANANDESHWAR CONSTRUCTION CO bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s. Nav Yug Construction Co. won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.