Competitor profile

NATRAJ ENGINEERING SERVICES

They win 40% of what they bid, but only 30% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

10tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
23 Dec 2024last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 Cr
of ₹9.4 Cr bid — 29.9% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count10 bids
40.0%
10.0%
50.0%
Awarded440.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected110.0%
Lost550.0%
By value₹9.4 Cr
29.9%
50.4%
19.7%
Awarded₹2.8 Cr29.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.7 Cr50.4%
Lost₹1.9 Cr19.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹2.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Strategic Marketing4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹5.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Data Vision0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
CGM COMPUTERS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹52.8 L
won head-to-head
04
SOFTKNOW COMPUTERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Dev Information Technology Limited0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNATRAJ ENGINEERING awardedOthers

About NATRAJ ENGINEERING SERVICES

NATRAJ ENGINEERING SERVICES appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹2.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Dec 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 77.8% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Strategic Marketing, Data Vision and CGM COMPUTERS. Strategic Marketing bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; NATRAJ ENGINEERING SERVICES won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.