Competitor profile

NATASA ENTERPRISES

They win 35% of what they bid, and 38% of the value they chase.

20tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
20
20 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.7 Cr
of ₹4.4 Cr bid — 38.1% conversion
Win rate
35.0%
of 20 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count20 bids
35.0%
10.0%
55.0%
Awarded735.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected210.0%
Lost1155.0%
By value₹4.4 Cr
38.1%
56.5%
Awarded₹1.7 Cr38.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹23.4 L5.4%
Lost₹2.5 Cr56.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Guru Kripa Enterprises2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹46.6 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s L L Kumar2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹31.3 L
won head-to-head
03
SWAYAM ENTERPRISES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KUMAR CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MAA JWALA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
VEDANT ENTERPRISES1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹8.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNATASA ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About NATASA ENTERPRISES

NATASA ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 20 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 20 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 35.0% win rate — worth ₹1.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Northern Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Guru Kripa Enterprises, M/s L L Kumar and SWAYAM ENTERPRISES. M/s Guru Kripa Enterprises bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; NATASA ENTERPRISES won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.