Competitor profile

M/s Guru Kripa Enterprises

They win 24% of what they bid, and 21% of the value they chase.

42tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
15 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
42
42 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.9 Cr
of ₹9.3 Cr bid — 20.9% conversion
Win rate
23.8%
of 42 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count42 bids
23.8%
31.0%
45.2%
Awarded1023.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1331.0%
Lost1945.2%
By value₹9.3 Cr
20.9%
14.7%
64.3%
Awarded₹1.9 Cr20.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 Cr14.7%
Lost₹6.0 Cr64.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

10 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s L L Kumar3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹60.7 L
won head-to-head
02
NATASA ENTERPRISES3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹33.6 L
won head-to-head
03
VEDANT ENTERPRISES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KUMAR CONSTRUCTION1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹9.8 L
won head-to-head
05
RAVINDRA CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹64.6 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S. VIKASH CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹58.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGuru Kripa awardedOthers

About M/s Guru Kripa Enterprises

M/s Guru Kripa Enterprises appears as a bidder on 42 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 42 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 23.8% win rate — worth ₹1.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Northern Coalfields Limited, at 89.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s L L Kumar, NATASA ENTERPRISES and VEDANT ENTERPRISES. M/s L L Kumar bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/s Guru Kripa Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.