Competitor profile

NATA DEVICES INDIA PVT LTD.

They win 17% of what they bid, but only 0.2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
5buyer authorities
4states
18 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 L
of ₹9.5 Cr bid — 0.2% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost466.7%
By value₹9.5 Cr
78.5%
21.3%
Awarded₹1.6 L0.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.5 Cr78.5%
Lost₹2.0 Cr21.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Haryana₹1.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Prostarm Info Systems Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Exsol Energy Systems Pvt Ltd0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ACTechno0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
BVM Technologies0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PANACEA ALLOYS PVT LTD1 win · 1 shared tender
₹68.2 L
won head-to-head
06
RS Power Systems Private Lilited0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNATA DEVICES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to NATA DEVICES

About NATA DEVICES INDIA PVT LTD.

NATA DEVICES INDIA PVT LTD. appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 4 states. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹1.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Haryana Board Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Haryana. On priced bids, its median quote is 11.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Prostarm Info Systems Limited, Exsol Energy Systems Pvt Ltd and ACTechno. Prostarm Info Systems Limited bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; NATA DEVICES INDIA PVT LTD. won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.