Competitor profile

NARULA SURGICALS

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
27 Feb 2025last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 1.4% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected266.7%
Lost00.0%
By value₹2.1 Cr
98.7%
Awarded₹2.8 L1.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.0 Cr98.7%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹2.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vista Medi Solutions1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.5 L
won head-to-head
02
G. K. ORTHOTICS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹45.4 L
won head-to-head
03
PAWAN ORTHOPAEDICS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹14.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Apex Surgitech0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Besa Scientific0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
AHUJASONS SURGICALS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNARULA SURGICALS awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to NARULA SURGICALS

About NARULA SURGICALS

NARULA SURGICALS appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹2.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Feb 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Medical Education and Research, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Vista Medi Solutions, G. K. ORTHOTICS and PAWAN ORTHOPAEDICS. Vista Medi Solutions bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; NARULA SURGICALS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.