Competitor profile

Naresh Jain-Jainco Buildcon Limited

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 7% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
16 Jan 2014last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹16.3 Cr bid — 7.1% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹16.3 Cr
92.9%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr7.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹15.1 Cr92.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Delhi Jal Board₹1.2 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Rajeh Sharma-M/s L.R.Sharma&Co.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
S.B. Aggarwal-TIRUPATI CEMENT PRODUCTS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹14.7 Cr
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Vikas Nagpal-M/s Nagpal Associates1 win · 1 shared tender
₹95.9 L
won head-to-head
05
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNaresh Jain-Jainco awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Naresh Jain-Jainco

About Naresh Jain-Jainco Buildcon Limited

Naresh Jain-Jainco Buildcon Limited appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Jan 2014.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Delhi Jal Board, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Rajeh Sharma-M/s L.R.Sharma&Co., S.B. Aggarwal-TIRUPATI CEMENT PRODUCTS and Shreyansh Jain-Rural Water Supply Co. (P) Ltd.. Rajeh Sharma-M/s L.R.Sharma&Co. bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Naresh Jain-Jainco Buildcon Limited won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.