Competitor profile

NAMAN CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.1 L
of ₹9.7 Cr bid — 1.1% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected266.7%
Lost00.0%
By value₹9.7 Cr
98.9%
Awarded₹11.1 L1.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.6 Cr98.9%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Directorate of Local Bodies UP₹11.1 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹11.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S RAJ CONSTRUCITON1 win · 1 shared tender
₹5.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Shubham Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S DINESH KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Garg Re Surfacing and Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S RIYA ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DURGA BUILDERS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAMAN CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to NAMAN CONSTRUCTIONS

About NAMAN CONSTRUCTIONS

NAMAN CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹11.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Local Bodies UP, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S RAJ CONSTRUCITON, Shubham Construction and M/S DINESH KUMAR SINGH. M/S RAJ CONSTRUCITON bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; NAMAN CONSTRUCTIONS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.