Competitor profile

NAKUL DILIP DHOMSE

They win 30% of what they bid — and 73% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

10tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 73.2% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count10 bids
30.0%
10.0%
60.0%
Awarded330.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected110.0%
Lost660.0%
By value₹1.9 Cr
73.1%
21.7%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr73.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.0 L5.2%
Lost₹41.9 L21.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
UJJWAL 885 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹23.0 L
won head-to-head
02
NIKHIL NAVNATH JADHAV0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHAKTISING VILASRAO DHOMASE1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Nilesh rakibe0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ANIRUDDHA AVINASH KAPADNIS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
TEJASKUMAR RAJENDRA KUWAR1 win · 1 shared tender
₹16.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAKUL DILIP awardedOthers

About NAKUL DILIP DHOMSE

NAKUL DILIP DHOMSE appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 59.9% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against UJJWAL 88, NIKHIL NAVNATH JADHAV and SHAKTISING VILASRAO DHOMASE. UJJWAL 88 bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; NAKUL DILIP DHOMSE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.