Competitor profile

MUHAMMED FAYIS A

They win 75% of what they bid, but only 62% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹69.6 L
of ₹1.1 Cr bid — 62.0% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹1.1 Cr
62.0%
38.0%
Awarded₹69.6 L62.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹42.6 L38.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹68.0 L97.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹69.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JABIR USMAN C.K.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
ABDUL NASAR. M0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
P SUBRAMANIAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Rejith B0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHIJU GEORGE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Kaladharan0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMUHAMMED FAYIS awardedOthers

About MUHAMMED FAYIS A

MUHAMMED FAYIS A appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹69.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 97.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against JABIR USMAN C.K., ABDUL NASAR. M and P SUBRAMANIAN. JABIR USMAN C.K. bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MUHAMMED FAYIS A won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.