Competitor profile

ABDUL NASAR. M

They win 27% of what they bid — and 42% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

22tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
22
22 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
14 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.1 Cr
of ₹7.4 Cr bid — 42.3% conversion
Win rate
27.3%
of 22 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count22 bids
27.3%
63.6%
Awarded627.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected29.1%
Lost1463.6%
By value₹7.4 Cr
42.2%
55.8%
Awarded₹3.1 Cr42.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.1 L1.9%
Lost₹4.1 Cr55.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹3.1 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹3.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHIJU GEORGE2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹23.2 L
won head-to-head
02
Aboobacker2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹26.3 L
won head-to-head
03
M. JAMAL1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.1 L
won head-to-head
04
Ramakrishnan0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ACCURATE INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MUHAMMED SHAHEEM .V2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹26.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedABDUL NASAR. awardedOthers

About ABDUL NASAR. M

ABDUL NASAR. M appears as a bidder on 22 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 22 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 27.3% win rate — worth ₹3.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHIJU GEORGE, Aboobacker and M. JAMAL. SHIJU GEORGE bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; ABDUL NASAR. M won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.