Competitor profile

MS Purbanchal Construction Services

They win 89% of what they bid, but only 63% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
17 Aug 2024last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹2.6 Cr bid — 62.7% conversion
Win rate
88.9%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
88.9%
11.1%
Awarded888.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost111.1%
By value₹2.6 Cr
62.7%
37.3%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr62.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹98.0 L37.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹1.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Dipen Kalita6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
02
Jalnur Hussain6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
03
MESER ALI AHMED6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
04
shoiab khan6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
05
KRISHNA ENGINEERINGS6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
06
TOMEZ UDDIN AHMED6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS Purbanchal awardedOthers

About MS Purbanchal Construction Services

MS Purbanchal Construction Services appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 88.9% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Aug 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Bodoland Territorial Council-PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Dipen Kalita, Jalnur Hussain and MESER ALI AHMED. Dipen Kalita bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; MS Purbanchal Construction Services won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.