Competitor profile

MS NABA KUMAR CONSTRUCTION

They win 8% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

36tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
36
36 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
33 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.4 L
of ₹88.4 L bid — 7.3% conversion
Win rate
8.3%
of 36 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count36 bids
91.7%
Awarded38.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3391.7%
By value₹88.4 L
92.8%
Awarded₹6.4 L7.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹82.0 L92.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹6.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹6.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS PUSPA CONSTRUCTION19 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹39.7 L
won head-to-head
02
MS MAA LAXMI CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹6.9 L
won head-to-head
03
BIKASH ROY3 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹7.4 L
won head-to-head
04
RAJENDRA NATH DAS0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SEVA CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹13.0 L
won head-to-head
06
RADHA GOBINDA ENTERPRISE3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹12.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS NABA KUMAR awardedOthers

About MS NABA KUMAR CONSTRUCTION

MS NABA KUMAR CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 36 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 36 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 8.3% win rate — worth ₹6.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS PUSPA CONSTRUCTION, MS MAA LAXMI CONSTRUCTION and BIKASH ROY. MS PUSPA CONSTRUCTION bid on 23 of the same tenders and won 19 of them; MS NABA KUMAR CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.