Competitor profile

MS KC ENGINEERING

They win 22% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
22 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 Cr
of ₹15.3 Cr bid — 18.5% conversion
Win rate
22.2%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
22.2%
11.1%
66.7%
Awarded222.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost666.7%
By value₹15.3 Cr
18.5%
79.6%
Awarded₹2.8 Cr18.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹28.6 L1.9%
Lost₹12.2 Cr79.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹2.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Abdul Motaleb2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹5.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
PINNACLE BUILDCON1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S J D ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
BIMAL KALITA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
DOLI MEDHI1 win · 1 shared tender
₹28.6 L
won head-to-head
06
TRIDIP KALITA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS KC ENGINEERING awardedOthers

About MS KC ENGINEERING

MS KC ENGINEERING appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 22.2% win rate — worth ₹2.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Bodoland Territorial Council, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Abdul Motaleb, PINNACLE BUILDCON and M/S J D ENTERPRISE. Abdul Motaleb bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; MS KC ENGINEERING won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.