Competitor profile

MS JANATA ENTERPRISE

They win 13% of what they bid, and 19% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
9 Dec 2024last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹52.0 L
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 18.5% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
12.5%
37.5%
50.0%
Awarded112.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected337.5%
Lost450.0%
By value₹2.8 Cr
18.5%
38.6%
42.8%
Awarded₹52.0 L18.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr38.6%
Lost₹1.2 Cr42.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹52.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MD. AZADUR RAHMAN0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MD Rafiqul Islam1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹27.7 L
won head-to-head
03
PRIME CONTRACTS AND SUPPLIERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
GAJI RAM DAS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
AMIT KUMAR TERON0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ANIMESH PAUL0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS JANATA ENTERPRISE awardedOthers

About MS JANATA ENTERPRISE

MS JANATA ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹52.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Dec 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Health Mission, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MD. AZADUR RAHMAN, MD Rafiqul Islam and PRIME CONTRACTS AND SUPPLIERS. MD. AZADUR RAHMAN bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MS JANATA ENTERPRISE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.