Competitor profile

MS AN3 ENTERPRISE

They win 40% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
3 Mar 2023last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.0 L
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 31.4% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
40.0%
20.0%
40.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected120.0%
Lost240.0%
By value₹2.8 Cr
31.4%
24.1%
44.5%
Awarded₹89.0 L31.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹68.3 L24.1%
Lost₹1.3 Cr44.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Irrigation Department₹53.3 L59.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹89.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHAKIL AHMED1 win · 1 shared tender
₹83.3 L
won head-to-head
02
Shri Sai Enterprise0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Sushil Kr. Khound0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Jitu Bhuyan0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Arsiddh Infraprojects0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Contractor0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS AN3 ENTERPRISE awardedOthers

About MS AN3 ENTERPRISE

MS AN3 ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹89.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Mar 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Irrigation Department, at 59.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHAKIL AHMED, Shri Sai Enterprise and Sushil Kr. Khound. SHAKIL AHMED bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; MS AN3 ENTERPRISE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.