Competitor profile

MS AFTAB LASKAR

They win 11% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

121tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
120
121 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
106 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.0 Cr
of ₹58.2 Cr bid — 10.2% conversion
Win rate
10.8%
of 120 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count120 bids
10.8%
88.3%
Awarded1310.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected10.8%
Lost10688.3%
By value₹58.2 Cr
10.2%
87.6%
Awarded₹6.0 Cr10.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 Cr2.2%
Lost₹51.0 Cr87.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

13 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S TAPAN KUMAR RAY6 wins · 101 shared tenders
₹2.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
m/s builders and suppliers5 wins · 81 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SHRI YOUNUS KHAN17 wins · 64 shared tenders
₹9.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S LUIT CONSTRUCTION6 wins · 57 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
ABDUL AUDUD10 wins · 53 shared tenders
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S SANJIB DEB3 wins · 51 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS AFTAB LASKAR awardedOthers

About MS AFTAB LASKAR

MS AFTAB LASKAR appears as a bidder on 121 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 120 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 10.8% win rate — worth ₹6.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S TAPAN KUMAR RAY, m/s builders and suppliers and SHRI YOUNUS KHAN. M/S TAPAN KUMAR RAY bid on 101 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; MS AFTAB LASKAR won 12.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.