Competitor profile

M/S LUIT CONSTRUCTION

They win 14% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

120tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
118
120 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
98 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.9 Cr
of ₹54.5 Cr bid — 10.8% conversion
Win rate
14.4%
of 118 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count118 bids
14.4%
83.1%
Awarded1714.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected32.5%
Lost9883.1%
By value₹54.5 Cr
10.7%
84.7%
Awarded₹5.9 Cr10.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.5 Cr4.5%
Lost₹46.1 Cr84.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

17 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S TAPAN KUMAR RAY5 wins · 72 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
m/s builders and suppliers2 wins · 59 shared tenders
₹88.3 L
won head-to-head
03
MS AFTAB LASKAR9 wins · 57 shared tenders
₹4.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S M P Sharma6 wins · 49 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S SUBHAM ENTERPRISE12 wins · 42 shared tenders
₹5.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S SANJIB DEB1 win · 41 shared tenders
₹48.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLUIT CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S LUIT CONSTRUCTION

M/S LUIT CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 120 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 118 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 14.4% win rate — worth ₹5.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S TAPAN KUMAR RAY, m/s builders and suppliers and MS AFTAB LASKAR. M/S TAPAN KUMAR RAY bid on 72 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; M/S LUIT CONSTRUCTION won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.