Competitor profile

M/S MOHD SAYEED CONTRACTOR

They win 33% of what they bid — and 44% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
27 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.3 L
of ₹50.3 L bid — 44.4% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹50.3 L
44.4%
55.6%
Awarded₹22.3 L44.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹27.9 L55.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹22.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S TRIPATHI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
JANKI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Sri Prakash Shukla1 win · 1 shared tender
₹18.0 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S MANOJ MISHRA THIKEDAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S Shree Shambhu Narayan Tiwari1 win · 1 shared tender
₹5.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMOHD SAYEED awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MOHD SAYEED

About M/S MOHD SAYEED CONTRACTOR

M/S MOHD SAYEED CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹22.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Local Bodies UP, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S TRIPATHI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER, JANKI ENTERPRISES and Sri Prakash Shukla. M/S TRIPATHI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S MOHD SAYEED CONTRACTOR won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.