Competitor profile

MITTAL PAVERS

They win 32% of what they bid, and 39% of the value they chase.

126tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
29 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
126
126 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
40
84 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.3 Cr
of ₹42.3 Cr bid — 38.6% conversion
Win rate
31.8%
of 126 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count126 bids
31.7%
66.7%
Awarded4031.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected21.6%
Lost8466.7%
By value₹42.3 Cr
38.6%
61.0%
Awarded₹16.3 Cr38.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹20.0 L0.5%
Lost₹25.8 Cr61.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE-PWD(B and R)₹2.0 Cr12.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹16.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ANMOL KATYAL CONTRACTOR5 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
HARVINDER SINGH CHAWLA27 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹3.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
HARJINDER KUMAR8 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹10.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SHRI SHYAM CONTRACTORS4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Aggarwal Electrical Engineers7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹27.0 L
won head-to-head
06
NATURE VIBES0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMITTAL PAVERS awardedOthers

About MITTAL PAVERS

MITTAL PAVERS appears as a bidder on 126 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 126 decided bids, it was awarded 40 — a 31.8% win rate — worth ₹16.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Rural Development and Panchayats, at 87.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ANMOL KATYAL CONTRACTOR, HARVINDER SINGH CHAWLA and HARJINDER KUMAR. ANMOL KATYAL CONTRACTOR bid on 34 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; MITTAL PAVERS won 19.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.