Competitor profile

Mitali Construction

They win 57% of what they bid, and 50% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
24 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
7
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.3 Cr
of ₹12.5 Cr bid — 50.1% conversion
Win rate
57.1%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
57.1%
42.9%
Awarded457.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost342.9%
By value₹12.5 Cr
50.1%
49.9%
Awarded₹6.3 Cr50.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6.2 Cr49.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹2.2 Cr34.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹6.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Atul S Nikam0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
₹3.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
BHANDARI CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHRINIWAS VASTUNIRMAN PVT LTD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
OMKAR INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Gaurav Prakash Pardeshi0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMitali Construction awardedOthers

About Mitali Construction

Mitali Construction appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 57.1% win rate — worth ₹6.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 65.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Atul S Nikam, KEDARESHWAR INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED and BHANDARI CONSTRUCTIONS. Atul S Nikam bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Mitali Construction won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.