Competitor profile

M/s Mehta and Mehta Construction

They win 25% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
2 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹85.7 L
of ₹5.4 Cr bid — 15.8% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
25.0%
50.0%
25.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected250.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹5.4 Cr
15.7%
71.8%
12.4%
Awarded₹85.7 L15.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.9 Cr71.8%
Lost₹67.6 L12.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹85.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RELANTBUILDUP1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹66.6 L
won head-to-head
02
VIJAYALAXMI FURNISHING2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹3.9 Cr
won head-to-head
03
A D SUTAR FURNITURE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
DT ASSOCIATES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹83.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMehta and Mehta awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Mehta and Mehta

About M/s Mehta and Mehta Construction

M/s Mehta and Mehta Construction appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹85.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region-Pune, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RELANTBUILDUP, VIJAYALAXMI FURNISHING and A D SUTAR FURNITURE. RELANTBUILDUP bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s Mehta and Mehta Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.