Competitor profile

MD SAPIOR RAHMAN

They win 19% of what they bid, and 24% of the value they chase.

31tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
16 Jul 2024last award
Total bids
31
31 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
14 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.6 Cr
of ₹48.1 Cr bid — 24.1% conversion
Win rate
19.4%
of 31 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count31 bids
19.4%
35.5%
45.2%
Awarded619.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1135.5%
Lost1445.2%
By value₹48.1 Cr
24.1%
16.2%
59.7%
Awarded₹11.6 Cr24.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.8 Cr16.2%
Lost₹28.7 Cr59.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹11.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Arabinda Nath0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
ABUL FAZAL ABDULLAH1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹48.3 L
won head-to-head
03
Md Nabirul Islam2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹4.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
ENAMUL HASSAN MONDAL4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
ROUSHAN ALOM ANSARY3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Jethmal Maloo2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹4.9 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMD SAPIOR RAHMAN awardedOthers

About MD SAPIOR RAHMAN

MD SAPIOR RAHMAN appears as a bidder on 31 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 31 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 19.4% win rate — worth ₹11.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Jul 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Roads Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Arabinda Nath, ABUL FAZAL ABDULLAH and Md Nabirul Islam. Arabinda Nath bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MD SAPIOR RAHMAN won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.