Competitor profile

MD. LATIFUL AHMED HUSSAIN

They win 17% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
18 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
30
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
22 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹11.8 Cr bid — 16.9% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count30 bids
16.7%
10.0%
73.3%
Awarded516.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected310.0%
Lost2273.3%
By value₹11.8 Cr
16.9%
74.9%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr16.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹97.0 L8.2%
Lost₹8.9 Cr74.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s R S ENTERPRISE2 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹66.9 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S S K ENTERPRISES1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹34.0 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹28.9 L
won head-to-head
04
Anil Kumar Sarmah1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹32.0 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S N S CONSTRUCTION1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹43.9 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S Bharat Construction Co.1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹39.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMD. LATIFUL awardedOthers

About MD. LATIFUL AHMED HUSSAIN

MD. LATIFUL AHMED HUSSAIN appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s R S ENTERPRISE, M/S S K ENTERPRISES and M/S LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES. M/s R S ENTERPRISE bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; MD. LATIFUL AHMED HUSSAIN won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.