Competitor profile

M/S LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES

They win 18% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

54tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
18 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
50
54 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.0 Cr
of ₹21.9 Cr bid — 13.8% conversion
Win rate
18.0%
of 50 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count50 bids
18.0%
76.0%
Awarded918.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected36.0%
Lost3876.0%
By value₹21.9 Cr
13.8%
14.1%
72.1%
Awarded₹3.0 Cr13.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.1 Cr14.1%
Lost₹15.8 Cr72.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Anil Kumar Sarmah1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹32.0 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s R S ENTERPRISE1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹24.0 L
won head-to-head
03
MD. LATIFUL AHMED HUSSAIN3 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S S K ENTERPRISES1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹34.0 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S Bharat Construction Co.1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹39.7 L
won head-to-head
06
Singhs Construction0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLAKSHMI ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES

M/S LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 54 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 50 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 18.0% win rate — worth ₹3.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Anil Kumar Sarmah, M/s R S ENTERPRISE and MD. LATIFUL AHMED HUSSAIN. Anil Kumar Sarmah bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S LAKSHMI ENTERPRISES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.