Competitor profile

MD. KUTUBUDDIN

They win 9% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

22tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
22
22 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.4 L
of ₹52.4 L bid — 8.5% conversion
Win rate
9.1%
of 22 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count22 bids
81.8%
Awarded29.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected29.1%
Lost1881.8%
By value₹52.4 L
40.6%
50.9%
Awarded₹4.4 L8.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹21.3 L40.6%
Lost₹26.7 L50.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹99,70022.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹4.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MD NASIM UDDIN0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SK HASANUJJAMAN4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹5.8 L
won head-to-head
03
SEKH SAMSER ALI0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
NASIRUDDIN KHAN1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹98,990
won head-to-head
05
BARSHA ENTERPRISE1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹98,980
won head-to-head
06
M/S ATIKA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMD. KUTUBUDDIN awardedOthers

About MD. KUTUBUDDIN

MD. KUTUBUDDIN appears as a bidder on 22 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 22 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 9.1% win rate — worth ₹4.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MALDA, at 77.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MD NASIM UDDIN, SK HASANUJJAMAN and SEKH SAMSER ALI. MD NASIM UDDIN bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MD. KUTUBUDDIN won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.