Competitor profile

MATTA SPORTS

They win 89% of what they bid — and 99.8% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
26 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
9
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹51.2 L
of ₹51.3 L bid — 99.8% conversion
Win rate
88.9%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
88.9%
11.1%
Awarded888.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost00.0%
By value₹51.3 L
99.8%
Awarded₹51.2 L99.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9,3500.2%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Department of Sports₹50.6 L98.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹51.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ess Kay Sports4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹34.7 L
won head-to-head
02
ESS KAY SPORTS INDUSTRIES2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹11,250
won head-to-head
03
ZAKHMI SCIENCE AND SPORTS GOODS3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹44,445
won head-to-head
04
P.RAM CHAND AND CO.3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹11,795
won head-to-head
05
HARI KRISHNA ENTERPRISE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹42,882
won head-to-head
06
ANAND SPORTS INDUSTRIES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMATTA SPORTS awardedOthers

About MATTA SPORTS

MATTA SPORTS appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 88.9% win rate — worth ₹51.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Sports, at 98.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 98.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ess Kay Sports, ESS KAY SPORTS INDUSTRIES and ZAKHMI SCIENCE AND SPORTS GOODS. Ess Kay Sports bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; MATTA SPORTS won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.