Competitor profile

MANOJ KR. HARLALKA

They win 47% of what they bid, but only 30% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

39tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
21 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
38
39 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
18
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.1 Cr
of ₹53.0 Cr bid — 30.4% conversion
Win rate
47.4%
of 38 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count38 bids
47.4%
21.1%
31.6%
Awarded1847.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected821.1%
Lost1231.6%
By value₹53.0 Cr
30.4%
42.6%
27.0%
Awarded₹16.1 Cr30.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹22.6 Cr42.6%
Lost₹14.3 Cr27.0%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹16.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
LAJIK BRAHMA6 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
02
Sri Bhupen Nath7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
03
Coupler Contrive Pvt Ltd7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
04
MRINAL ADHIKARY7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
05
ANUPAM NIRMAN PVT. LTD.7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
06
GOURI SANKAR DEKA BORUAH7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMANOJ KR. HARLALKA awardedOthers

About MANOJ KR. HARLALKA

MANOJ KR. HARLALKA appears as a bidder on 39 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 38 decided bids, it was awarded 18 — a 47.4% win rate — worth ₹16.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Bodoland Territorial Council-PWD, at 69.4% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against LAJIK BRAHMA, Sri Bhupen Nath and Coupler Contrive Pvt Ltd. LAJIK BRAHMA bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; MANOJ KR. HARLALKA won 11.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.