Competitor profile

Mamta Electronics

They win 22% of what they bid — and 83% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

9tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 83.5% conversion
Win rate
22.2%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
22.2%
11.1%
66.7%
Awarded222.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost666.7%
By value₹1.5 Cr
83.5%
12.8%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr83.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.5 L3.7%
Lost₹19.1 L12.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SHINE ENTERPRISES6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹18.9 L
won head-to-head
02
Vangarde 21 Computers0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
TIRUPATHI CREATION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹67,300
won head-to-head
04
TECHNOSOFT1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
05
KAMAL PANDAY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KESHAR CHETTRI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMamta Electronics awardedOthers

About Mamta Electronics

Mamta Electronics appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 22.2% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is GORKHALAND TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATION, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SHINE ENTERPRISES, Vangarde 21 Computers and TIRUPATHI CREATION. M/S SHINE ENTERPRISES bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; Mamta Electronics won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.