Competitor profile

MALAY JANA

They win 17% of what they bid, but only 4% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
18 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 L
of ₹39.7 L bid — 3.8% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹39.7 L
96.2%
Awarded₹1.5 L3.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹38.2 L96.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹1.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹1.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Puspa Ranjan Sar1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹2.3 L
won head-to-head
02
PARTHA PRATIM SAR1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
03
ADHIKARI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SK MOHAMMAD SOHAIL0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RANJIT MALLICK2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
06
MAA BASANTI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹30.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMALAY JANA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MALAY JANA

About MALAY JANA

MALAY JANA appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹1.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Puspa Ranjan Sar, PARTHA PRATIM SAR and ADHIKARI CONSTRUCTION. Puspa Ranjan Sar bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MALAY JANA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.