Competitor profile

Majestic Construction

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 20% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

16tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
3 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.9 Cr
of ₹9.6 Cr bid — 20.2% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
50.0%
43.8%
Awarded850.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected16.3%
Lost743.8%
By value₹9.6 Cr
20.2%
15.9%
63.9%
Awarded₹1.9 Cr20.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.5 Cr15.9%
Lost₹6.1 Cr63.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹5.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Om Sai Enterprises2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹25.5 L
won head-to-head
03
Varad Rajendra Sawant2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹36.6 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Atul Vilas Shewale1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1
won head-to-head
05
Nikhil Enterprises0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Chhhatrapat A. Lomate0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMajestic Construction awardedOthers

About Majestic Construction

Majestic Construction appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Thane Municipal Corporation Thane, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SHRI SANKALP INFRASTRUCTURE AND INTERIOR, Om Sai Enterprises and Varad Rajendra Sawant. SHRI SANKALP INFRASTRUCTURE AND INTERIOR bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Majestic Construction won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.