Competitor profile

M/s. Madhava Construction

They win 39% of what they bid, but only 28% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

67tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
8 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
67
67 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
26
37 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.7 Cr
of ₹30.9 Cr bid — 28.0% conversion
Win rate
38.8%
of 67 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count67 bids
38.8%
55.2%
Awarded2638.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected46.0%
Lost3755.2%
By value₹30.9 Cr
28.0%
69.1%
Awarded₹8.7 Cr28.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹87.9 L2.8%
Lost₹21.4 Cr69.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Puducherry₹8.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
D Boopalan0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
S. SUNDARAMOORTHY0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Krishna kumar1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SIVAKUMAR K1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹21.3 L
won head-to-head
05
Premananth R0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
G PALANIRAJ0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMadhava Construction awardedOthers

About M/s. Madhava Construction

M/s. Madhava Construction appears as a bidder on 67 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 67 decided bids, it was awarded 26 — a 38.8% win rate — worth ₹8.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Puducherry. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against D Boopalan, S. SUNDARAMOORTHY and Krishna kumar. D Boopalan bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s. Madhava Construction won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.