Competitor profile

Maa Vijyasan Construction

They win 67% of what they bid, but only 51% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
8 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹35.9 L
of ₹70.6 L bid — 50.9% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded466.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost233.3%
By value₹70.6 L
50.9%
49.1%
Awarded₹35.9 L50.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹34.6 L49.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
I C CONSULTANCY SERVICES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MS INAYA INFRASTRUCTURE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹9.5 L
won head-to-head
03
ZAKIR CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
THAKUR CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
NARMADA TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAGHUWANSHI BUILDCON0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMaa Vijyasan awardedOthers

About Maa Vijyasan Construction

Maa Vijyasan Construction appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹35.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against I C CONSULTANCY SERVICES, MS INAYA INFRASTRUCTURE and ZAKIR CONSTRUCTION. I C CONSULTANCY SERVICES bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Maa Vijyasan Construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.