Competitor profile

NARMADA TRADERS

They win 17% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
14 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.0 L
of ₹63.4 L bid — 7.9% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹63.4 L
92.1%
Awarded₹5.0 L7.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹58.4 L92.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHRI AMBEY TRADERS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹11.3 L
won head-to-head
02
Mohamad Hameed Qureshi2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹19.7 L
won head-to-head
03
PRADESH THAKUR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
STAR TRADERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAJKUMAR SEXENA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹5.0 L
won head-to-head
06
VINAYAK CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹12.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNARMADA TRADERS awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to NARMADA TRADERS

About NARMADA TRADERS

NARMADA TRADERS appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹5.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 20.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHRI AMBEY TRADERS, Mohamad Hameed Qureshi and PRADESH THAKUR. SHRI AMBEY TRADERS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; NARMADA TRADERS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.