Competitor profile

MAA SITALA ENTERPRISE

They win 30% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.8 L
of ₹1.1 Cr bid — 27.9% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
30.0%
20.0%
50.0%
Awarded330.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected220.0%
Lost550.0%
By value₹1.1 Cr
27.9%
68.9%
Awarded₹31.8 L27.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.6 L3.2%
Lost₹78.6 L68.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹31.8 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹31.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
EBADUR RAHAMAN1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹6.0 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S MAA MANASHA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹8.1 L
won head-to-head
03
MAA KALI ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MOULI SUPPLIERS AND CONTRACTOR2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹2.1 L
won head-to-head
05
KADERIYA ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
LAKSHMI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAA SITALA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MAA SITALA

About MAA SITALA ENTERPRISE

MAA SITALA ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹31.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against EBADUR RAHAMAN, M/S MAA MANASHA CONSTRUCTION and MAA KALI ENTERPRISE. EBADUR RAHAMAN bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MAA SITALA ENTERPRISE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.