Competitor profile

Maa Kushmanda Construction

They win 4% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

23tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
25 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
23
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
21 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.1 L
of ₹2.6 Cr bid — 1.6% conversion
Win rate
4.3%
of 23 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count23 bids
91.3%
Awarded14.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected14.3%
Lost2191.3%
By value₹2.6 Cr
89.0%
Awarded₹4.1 L1.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹25.0 L9.5%
Lost₹2.3 Cr89.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SAHIL TRADERS1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹25.5 L
won head-to-head
02
ANIKA CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹8.2 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S SHIVA CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹25.4 L
won head-to-head
04
NAVYA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ANSH TRADERS1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹8.1 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S SHUBH BUILDERS1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹7.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMaa Kushmanda awardedOthers

About Maa Kushmanda Construction

Maa Kushmanda Construction appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 23 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 4.3% win rate — worth ₹4.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Kanpur Municipal Corporation, Kanpur, UP, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SAHIL TRADERS, ANIKA CONSTRUCTIONS and M/S SHIVA CONSTRUCTIONS. M/S SAHIL TRADERS bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Maa Kushmanda Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.