Competitor profile

MAA KAMAKHYA ENTERPRISE

They win 32% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

29tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
4 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
28
29 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.5 Cr
of ₹13.2 Cr bid — 41.6% conversion
Win rate
32.1%
of 28 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count28 bids
32.1%
35.7%
32.1%
Awarded932.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1035.7%
Lost932.1%
By value₹13.2 Cr
41.7%
39.2%
19.2%
Awarded₹5.5 Cr41.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.2 Cr39.2%
Lost₹2.5 Cr19.2%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹5.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HRIDAY JUGAL DAS2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹50.2 L
won head-to-head
02
DAL THOMS SCIENTIFIC0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RAHUL KALITA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
P.S. ENTERPRISE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹58.3 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S TRIKUTA ENTERPRISE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹38.5 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S MAZUMDAR ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAA KAMAKHYA awardedOthers

About MAA KAMAKHYA ENTERPRISE

MAA KAMAKHYA ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 29 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 28 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 32.1% win rate — worth ₹5.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Roads Department, at 88.6% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against HRIDAY JUGAL DAS, DAL THOMS SCIENTIFIC and RAHUL KALITA. HRIDAY JUGAL DAS bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; MAA KAMAKHYA ENTERPRISE won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.